Performance blood testing / United Kingdom

Blood tests for athletes in the UK

What to test, what the numbers actually mean when you train hard, and where standard reference ranges stop being useful.

Normal doesn't mean you're at your best.

The short answer

A blood test for athletes measures the markers that limit training capacity, recovery and adaptation, then reads them against thresholds relevant to performance rather than against the population ranges used to flag disease. The markers that matter most are iron status, vitamin D, the full blood count, thyroid function, hormonal and energy availability markers, inflammation, and markers of muscle and kidney load. A result can sit inside a standard laboratory reference range and still be at a level where published research shows measurable effects on training capacity. That is why athletes are frequently told their bloods are normal while still feeling flat.

The core problem

Why standard reference ranges are built to detect disease, not performance

Standard laboratory reference ranges are statistical, not physiological. They are typically built by measuring a reference population and taking the middle 95 per cent of results, which means the boundaries describe where most people sit rather than where any individual functions well. That design is appropriate for its purpose. NHS testing exists to find and rule out disease, and it does that job well. It was never designed to answer whether an endurance athlete has enough iron to build haemoglobin during a heavy block.

The gap between those two questions is measurable. Work by Galetti and colleagues, published in eClinicalMedicine in 2021, pooled stable iron isotope studies in more than a thousand healthy women and identified the ferritin concentration at which the body starts increasing how much iron it absorbs from food. That inflection point sat at 51.1 micrograms per litre. Below it, absorption is progressively upregulated, which is the body signalling that stores are running down. Most UK laboratory reference ranges place their lower limit for ferritin far below that figure.

Standard read 32 Ferritin, micrograms per litre Normal. No action.

Sits inside a typical laboratory reference range, so it is reported as within range and no follow up is triggered.

Performance read 32 Ferritin, micrograms per litre Below where absorption upregulates.

Sits under the point at which iron absorption starts increasing, and under the stage one depletion threshold used in athlete research. Worth acting on, with inflammation checked alongside it.

Illustrative single value read two ways. Interpretation always depends on symptoms, training load, sex, inflammatory markers and trend over time, not one number in isolation.

What to test

Which blood markers matter most for athletes

The markers worth testing in athletes are the ones with a documented link to training capacity, recovery or injury risk, and which can be acted on. Below is what each one tells you and where the evidence is strong or mixed.

Iron status: ferritin, transferrin saturation, and inflammation alongside

Performance range

Iron is the single highest yield area in athlete blood testing because deficiency is common and treatable. The narrative review by Sim and colleagues in the European Journal of Applied Physiology reports iron deficiency in roughly 15 to 35 per cent of female athlete cohorts and roughly 5 to 11 per cent of male athlete cohorts. Endurance and impact sports carry higher risk through foot strike haemolysis, sweat and gastrointestinal losses, and an exercise driven rise in the hormone hepcidin, which suppresses iron absorption for a period after hard sessions.

Ferritin cannot be read alone. The World Health Organization guideline on ferritin concentrations, published in 2020, is explicit that ferritin is an acute phase protein and should be assessed alongside inflammatory markers, with the threshold defining deficiency raised where inflammation is present. Hard training is an inflammatory stimulus, so a ferritin drawn shortly after a heavy block can read falsely reassuring.

On treatment, the evidence is genuinely mixed and worth stating plainly. The meta-analysis by Burden and colleagues in the British Journal of Sports Medicine found large improvements in ferritin, serum iron and transferrin saturation with iron treatment in iron deficient non-anaemic endurance athletes. The more recent meta-analysis by Šmid and colleagues in Sports Medicine found the ferritin response to oral iron was clear mainly in athletes starting below 12 micrograms per litre, and reported only a small, non significant trend toward improved maximal oxygen uptake. Correcting iron status is well supported. Guaranteeing a performance gain from doing so is not. Read the full breakdown of ferritin levels for athletes.

Vitamin D, and why UK latitude changes the question

Performance range

Vitamin D matters in the UK for a reason that has nothing to do with sport: for roughly half the year, UK sunlight is not strong enough for the skin to make it. The Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition concluded in its 2016 report that from late March or early April to the end of September most people can synthesise what they need, and set a reference nutrient intake of 10 micrograms per day for everyone aged four and over, with the risk of poor musculoskeletal health rising below a blood 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration of 25 nanomoles per litre.

The athlete specific picture is more cautious than supplement marketing suggests. Owens, Allison and Close, writing in Sports Medicine, note that studies have consistently failed to show a relationship between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D and bone health in athletes, which they suggest may be because the loading stimulus of training itself drives bone adaptation. They also flag that high dose supplementation without testing carries its own risk. That is the argument for measuring rather than guessing. Read more on vitamin D and UK athletes.

Full blood count: haemoglobin, haematocrit and red cell indices

What we look for

The full blood count in a trained athlete needs interpreting against training status, not just against the range. Endurance training expands blood volume, and Sawka and colleagues, in their review in Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, describe plasma volume expanding almost immediately while red cell volume takes weeks to follow. The result is that a well trained endurance athlete can show a lower haemoglobin concentration than an untrained person while carrying more total haemoglobin. This is dilution, not anaemia, and it is a common source of unnecessary alarm. Red cell indices, iron markers and trend over time separate the two.

Thyroid function

What we look for

Thyroid markers are worth testing when fatigue, cold intolerance, unexplained weight change or a stalled training response are present. Thyroid hormones set metabolic rate, and low energy availability can suppress them, which is why thyroid results are read alongside energy intake, training load and other endocrine markers rather than on their own.

Hormonal and energy availability markers

What we look for

Persistent under-fuelling relative to training load has consequences that show up in blood before they show up in performance. The 2023 International Olympic Committee consensus statement on Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport, published in the British Journal of Sports Medicine, describes a syndrome affecting bone, endocrine, metabolic, haematological, immune, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal and psychological health in both female and male athletes, and sets out biomarkers among the indicators used to stratify risk. The consensus is clear that low energy availability sits on a spectrum and that no single blood marker diagnoses it. Blood results contribute to a picture that also needs training history, menstrual history where relevant, and clinical assessment.

Inflammation and immune markers

What we look for

Inflammatory markers serve two functions in an athlete panel. They flag genuine underlying inflammation or infection, and they provide the context needed to read other markers correctly, ferritin in particular. Because hard training raises inflammatory markers transiently, timing the draw away from heavy sessions matters more here than almost anywhere else on the panel.

Muscle, liver and kidney load markers

What we look for

Creatine kinase, liver enzymes and kidney markers are the ones most likely to be misread in athletes. Mougios, in the British Journal of Sports Medicine, measured creatine kinase across 483 male and 245 female athletes and reported athlete reference intervals of 82 to 1083 units per litre in men and 47 to 513 units per litre in women. The upper limits were around twice those reported for moderately active non-athletes and up to six times those for inactive people. Within athletes, the interval differed threefold between football players and swimmers, which is the clearest available evidence that sport and training phase, not just training status, shape what a normal result looks like.

Interpretation

Why an athlete's blood results can look abnormal when nothing is wrong

Several markers move predictably in response to training, and each one produces a recognisable false alarm. Knowing which is which is most of the skill in reading athlete bloods.

Creatine kinase rises after loading. Eccentric work, contact sport and unaccustomed sessions all raise it. A high reading days after a hard session usually reflects muscle turnover, not pathology, and Mougios showed athlete reference intervals sit far above non-athlete ones.

Haemoglobin can look low in trained endurance athletes. Plasma volume expands faster than red cell volume, so concentration falls while total oxygen carrying capacity is unchanged or better.

Ferritin can look reassuring after hard training. Ferritin behaves as an acute phase protein, so inflammation pushes it up and can mask depleted stores. This is why the World Health Organization guidance is to measure inflammatory markers alongside it.

Kidney markers can shift with muscle mass and hydration. Creatinine reflects muscle mass as well as kidney function, so estimated filtration rates derived from it can read low in heavily muscled athletes without indicating kidney disease.

None of this means an abnormal result should be waved away. It means the result needs context. Anything that could indicate disease is routed back to a GP, always, and IMULAB reports say so explicitly. Blood test results explained for athletes covers this marker by marker.

Stated plainly

What blood testing cannot tell you

Every test has a boundary, and knowing where it sits is part of using the result properly. Here is where blood testing stops.

  • 01It cannot diagnose overtraining. No blood marker or combination of markers reliably identifies overtraining syndrome. The IOC consensus on Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport notes the overlap between the two conditions and the diagnostic difficulty that creates. Training load data, performance trend and clinical assessment carry more weight than bloods here.
  • 02It cannot predict your performance. Correcting a deficiency removes a limiter. It does not add capacity that was not there. The meta-analysis evidence on iron treatment and maximal oxygen uptake in non-anaemic athletes remains inconclusive.
  • 03A single draw is a snapshot. Many markers vary by time of day, hydration status, recent training and menstrual cycle phase. One result establishes a position. A second one establishes a direction, which is more useful.
  • 04It cannot replace clinical care. Testing is not diagnosis, and IMULAB is not a substitute for your GP or your sports medicine team. Results that suggest a clinical problem belong with a doctor who can examine you.
  • 05It cannot tell you what to eat. Blood markers indicate where a nutritional gap may exist. Closing it is a dietary and training question, and often needs a registered practitioner.
Before you test

How to prepare for a blood test as an athlete

Preparation matters more for athletes than for the general population, because training itself moves several of the markers being measured. The aim is a sample that reflects your baseline rather than your last session.

  • Leave a gap after hard trainingAllow at least 24 to 48 hours after a heavy or unaccustomed session before testing, particularly if muscle damage, inflammatory or iron markers are on the panel. Light movement in that window is fine.
  • Test in the morning where you canSeveral hormones follow a daily rhythm and are conventionally measured in the morning. Keeping the time of day consistent between tests matters as much as the specific hour, because it makes results comparable.
  • Be normally hydratedDehydration concentrates the sample and can shift haematocrit and several other markers. Drink as you normally would. Do not load up immediately beforehand either.
  • Follow the fasting instruction you are givenWhether fasting is required depends on which markers are included. Where it is needed, water is allowed. Your booking confirmation will state it.
  • Hold new supplements brieflyHigh dose supplements can affect certain readings. If you have recently started something new and want a clean baseline, discuss timing before you book rather than after.
  • Note where you are in your cycleFor athletes who menstruate, cycle phase affects several markers. Recording the day makes the result interpretable and future comparisons meaningful.
  • Repeat under the same conditionsSame time of day, similar training week, similar hydration. Trend is the most useful output of testing, and trend requires consistency.
Frequency

How often should an athlete test

Most athletes get the useful information from testing two to three times a year, positioned around the training year rather than at random. A common structure is one test in pre-season to establish a baseline, one mid-season to check whether load is being tolerated, and one after the main competitive block or after a period of heavy volume.

Test more often when there is a reason: a deficiency being corrected and needing rechecking, a symptom that has not resolved, an altitude or heat block, a change in training environment, or a persistent drop in performance that has no obvious explanation. Test less often when nothing has changed. Repeat testing without a question to answer produces numbers, not information.

How it works

How blood testing works with IMULAB

IMULAB is a UK performance blood testing company for athletes and high performers. Samples are drawn by trained phlebotomists at Superdrug health clinics across the UK, with at home testing kits availble for some tests including finger prick and a nurse network allowing for at home visits UK wide. You book online, attend your chosen clinic or arrange your sample with a nurse at home or finger prick options. Then receive a report that reads each marker through a performance lens with the underlying evidence stated.

The reports say what a result means for training, what to do about it, and where the evidence is uncertain. Anything clinically concerning is flagged for your GP. Find a clinic near you, or read the specifics for cyclists and mountain bikers.

Questions

Frequently asked questions

  • What blood tests should an athlete get in the UK?

    The highest value markers for most UK athletes are iron status including ferritin with inflammatory markers alongside, vitamin D, a full blood count, thyroid function, and hormonal markers relevant to energy availability. Markers of muscle, liver and kidney load are useful for interpreting training tolerance. Which of these apply depends on the sport, the training phase and the symptoms, so the panel should follow the question you are trying to answer rather than the other way round.

  • Can a blood test tell me if I am overtraining?

    No. There is no blood marker or combination of markers that reliably diagnoses overtraining syndrome. The 2023 International Olympic Committee consensus statement on Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport notes the overlap between low energy availability and overtraining, which makes the two difficult to separate on bloods alone. Blood testing can identify contributors such as iron deficiency or suppressed hormonal markers, but the diagnosis needs training load data, performance history and clinical assessment.

  • How long after training should I wait before a blood test?

    Allow at least 24 to 48 hours after a hard or unaccustomed session. Exercise transiently raises creatine kinase and inflammatory markers, and inflammation raises ferritin, which can make depleted iron stores look adequate. Testing in a rested state, at a consistent time of day, gives a result that reflects your baseline rather than your last session.

  • Do I need to fast before an athlete blood test?

    It depends which markers are included. Some markers require fasting and some do not, so follow the instruction given at booking rather than a general rule. Where fasting is required, water is allowed and encouraged, because dehydration concentrates the sample and shifts several readings.

  • Is a blood test for athletes different from an NHS blood test?

    The laboratory analysis is the same. The difference is the question being asked and the thresholds used to answer it. NHS testing is designed to detect and rule out disease, and it does that job well. Performance testing asks whether a marker sits at a level that supports training, recovery and adaptation, which is a different threshold and often a higher one. A result can be reported as normal by disease criteria while still sitting where research shows an effect on training capacity.

  • Can I get an athlete blood test through the NHS?

    Your GP will test when there is a clinical reason, such as symptoms suggesting anaemia, thyroid dysfunction or another condition. NHS testing is not set up to provide routine performance monitoring for healthy athletes, because that is not what it exists to do. If your results suggest a clinical problem, that belongs with your GP, and any private test result that raises concern should be taken to them.

  • How often should athletes have blood tests?

    Two to three times a year suits most athletes, positioned around the training year rather than at random intervals. A typical structure is a pre-season baseline, a mid-season check and a post-competition test. Test more frequently when there is a specific reason, such as correcting a known deficiency, investigating unresolved symptoms, or preparing for an altitude or heat block.

  • What ferritin level should an athlete have?

    There is no single agreed figure, and anyone quoting one with confidence is overstating the evidence. Research in athlete populations commonly uses a ferritin below 35 micrograms per litre to define the first stage of iron depletion, and a 2021 analysis of iron absorption studies found that absorption begins to increase below approximately 50 micrograms per litre in healthy young women, which suggests stores are being drawn down at that point. Ferritin must be interpreted alongside inflammatory markers, because it rises with inflammation and can therefore mask genuine depletion.

KNOW. ACT. BECOME.

Test the rider, not just the ride

Performance blood testing drawn by trained phlebotomists at Superdrug health clinics across the UK, read against the evidence rather than the population average.

See testing options

References

Sources

  1. Sim M, Garvican-Lewis LA, Cox GR, Govus A, McKay AKA, Stellingwerff T, Peeling P. Iron considerations for the athlete: a narrative review. European Journal of Applied Physiology. 2019;119(7):1463-1478. doi:10.1007/s00421-019-04157-y
  2. Galetti V, Stoffel NU, Sieber C, Zeder C, Moretti D, Zimmermann MB. Threshold ferritin and hepcidin concentrations indicating early iron deficiency in young women based on upregulation of iron absorption. eClinicalMedicine. 2021;39:101052. doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101052
  3. Burden RJ, Morton K, Richards T, Whyte GP, Pedlar CR. Is iron treatment beneficial in, iron-deficient but non-anaemic (IDNA) endurance athletes? A systematic review and meta-analysis. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2015;49(21):1389-1397. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2014-093624
  4. Šmid AN, Golja P, Hadžić V, Abazović E, Drole K, Paravlic AH. Effects of oral iron supplementation on blood iron status in athletes: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression of randomized controlled trials. Sports Medicine. 2024;54(5):1231-1247. doi:10.1007/s40279-024-01992-8
  5. World Health Organization. WHO guideline on use of ferritin concentrations to assess iron status in individuals and populations. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2020. who.int
  6. Owens DJ, Allison R, Close GL. Vitamin D and the athlete: current perspectives and new challenges. Sports Medicine. 2018;48(Suppl 1):3-16. doi:10.1007/s40279-017-0841-9
  7. Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition. Vitamin D and Health. London: SACN; 2016. gov.uk
  8. Mougios V. Reference intervals for serum creatine kinase in athletes. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2007;41(10):674-678. doi:10.1136/bjsm.2006.034041
  9. Sawka MN, Convertino VA, Eichner ER, Schnieder SM, Young AJ. Blood volume: importance and adaptations to exercise training, environmental stresses, and trauma/sickness. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 2000;32(2):332-348. doi:10.1097/00005768-200002000-00012
  10. Mountjoy M, Ackerman KE, Bailey DM, et al. 2023 International Olympic Committee's (IOC) consensus statement on Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport (REDs). British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2023;57(17):1073-1097. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2023-106994

General information. This page is for general information and education. It is not medical advice, and it is not a diagnosis. It does not replace assessment by a qualified healthcare professional. If you have symptoms that concern you, or a result that falls outside a clinical reference range, speak to your GP. IMULAB testing is intended to sit alongside NHS care, not to replace it.

Last reviewed August 2026.